Greg's logic makes it easier and simpler to make up a decision , since we are revealed and aware to the following consequences of our decision in which therefore helps us to come up with the most ideal decision. He narrows the options down into 2 columns which gives us to options to chose from. Although in option A we could ultimately save the earth from global warming, there will be a great money loss if global warming does not eventually happen. In option B there could be a less money loss but still some money can be lost if there will be global warming. Even though most people will chose option A to be safe I think that it can cause a great economical depression which can affect most of the work in many different ways .
An example using his logic is if a natural disaster is happening in a country and Uganda wants to send troops to help the injured people. If they send the aid troops there could be a great help on the other country and many lives could be saved however the people that are going to help can be caught in the natural disaster. On the other hand if aid is not sent a lot of people will not get enough medical help and people can die or get even more injured but the troops will not get caught in very dangerous situation.
